Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 36(4): 310-314, 2021 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1125541

ABSTRACT

Technological advances provide a number of options for glaucoma monitoring outside the office setting, including home-based tonometry and perimetry. This has the potential to revolutionize management of this chronic disease, improve access to care, and enhance patient engagement. Here, we provide an overview of existing technologies for home-based glaucoma monitoring. We also discuss areas for future research and the potential applications of these technologies to telemedicine, which has been brought to the forefront during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/trends , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Monitoring, Ambulatory , Telemedicine/trends , Telemetry/instrumentation , Biomedical Technology/trends , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Ophthalmology/trends , Self Care/methods , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Visual Field Tests/methods
3.
Heart Lung Circ ; 30(7): 1044-1049, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the era of COVID-19, travel restrictions and social distancing measures have changed the landscape for device interrogations of pacemakers and defibrillators for rural Victorians. Previously, device checks were performed infrequently in large volume, face-to-face rural clinics by visiting cardiologists and technicians. Access to remote areas and social distancing restrictions have made these clinics unfeasible to operate. The Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) COVID-19 consensus statements have suggested the utilisation of remote monitoring to minimise the potential spread of COVID-19 infections between clinicians and high-risk patients. A novel solution to this challenge was the implementation of a remote device interrogation (RI) service located in two kiosks at two rural pharmacies. This service was termed Remote Device Interrogation Kiosks (ReDInK). AIM: This cross-sectional observational study aimed to describe the set-up process, safety and efficacy of RI and customer satisfaction of the ReDInK program. METHODS: Two-hundred-and-ninety-two (292) rurally located patients with implantable cardiac devices were identified via the cardiology department database. Of these, 101 (44%) were enrolled into the ReDInK program across two rurally located pharmacies between April and July 2020. RI was performed and download outcomes were reviewed. A customer satisfaction survey assessed attitudes towards the program and explored options of ongoing service application. RESULTS: Of 101 patients enrolled into ReDInK, 96 (95%) resulted in satisfactory device checks. Four (4) individuals failed-to-attend and one individual experienced technical download issues. Of the 96 satisfactory device checks, three required in-person follow-up for reasons including battery replacement, lead repositioning and in-person programming. No adverse events were reported. A satisfaction telephone survey was conducted with 81 (83%) participants enrolled in ReDInK. Seventy-one (71) individuals (88%) of those surveyed expressed satisfaction and 73 (90%) labelled the process as efficiently conducted. Sixty-nine (69) (85%) participants felt reassured that this service was established during the pandemic. However 47 (58%) participants reported they would still feel comfortable to undergo in-person reviews despite social distancing recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: With the COVID-19 pandemic posing restrictions to social distancing and reducing unnecessary in-person interaction, the ReDInK program emerges as an efficacious and safe solution for patients in rural Victoria. The program's widely positive reception and successful conduction in rural Victoria invites further opportunity for a wider application of similar programs, expanding its role to metropolitan areas.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Patient Satisfaction , Rural Health Services , Telemetry , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pharmacies , Telemetry/instrumentation , Victoria
4.
Biosens Bioelectron ; 178: 113007, 2021 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1046560

ABSTRACT

Recent progress in biosensors have quantitively expanded current capabilities in exploratory research tools, diagnostics and therapeutics. This rapid pace in sensor development has been accentuated by vast improvements in data analysis methods in the form of machine learning and artificial intelligence that, together, promise fantastic opportunities in chronic sensing of biosignals to enable preventative screening, automated diagnosis, and tools for personalized treatment strategies. At the same time, the importance of widely accessible personal monitoring has become evident by recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Progress in fully integrated and chronic sensing solutions is therefore increasingly important. Chronic operation, however, is not truly possible with tethered approaches or bulky, battery-powered systems that require frequent user interaction. A solution for this integration challenge is offered by wireless and battery-free platforms that enable continuous collection of biosignals. This review summarizes current approaches to realize such device architectures and discusses their building blocks. Specifically, power supplies, wireless communication methods and compatible sensing modalities in the context of most prevalent implementations in target organ systems. Additionally, we highlight examples of current embodiments that quantitively expand sensing capabilities because of their use of wireless and battery-free architectures.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Artificial Intelligence , Bioelectric Energy Sources , Biosensing Techniques/trends , COVID-19/physiopathology , Electric Power Supplies , Electrophysiological Phenomena , Equipment Design , Humans , Pandemics , Remote Sensing Technology/instrumentation , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemetry/instrumentation , Wearable Electronic Devices , Wireless Technology/trends
8.
J Hosp Med ; 16(1): 7-14, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-910294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) hospitalizations for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outside disease epicenters remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Systematic analysis of all non-ICU patient hospitalizations for COVID-19 completing discharge between March 13 and May 1, 2020, in a large US health care system utilizing off-site central monitoring. Variables of interest were examined in relation to a composite event rate of death, ICU transfer, or increased oxygen requirement to high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 350 patients (age, 64 ± 16 years; 55% male), most (73%) required 3 L/min or less of supplemental oxygen during admission. Telemetry was widely utilized (79%) yet arrhythmias were uncommon (14%) and were predominantly (90%) among patients with abnormal troponin levels or known cardiovascular disease. Ventricular tachycardia was rare (5%), nonsustained, and not associated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin treatment. Adverse events occurred in 62 patients (18%), including 22 deaths (6%), 48 ICU transfers (14%), and 49 patients with increased oxygen requirement (14%) and were independently associated with elevated C-reactive protein (odds ratio, 1.09 per 1 mg/dL; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = .04) and lactate dehydrogenase (OR, 1.006 per 1U/L; 95% CI, 1.001-1.012; P = .03) in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Among non-critically ill patients hospitalized within a nonepicenter health care system, overall survival was 94% with the development of more severe illness or death independently associated with higher levels of C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase on admission. Clinical decompensation was largely respiratory-related, while serious cardiac arrhythmias were rare, which suggests that telemetry can be prioritized for high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/physiopathology , Hospitalization , Telemetry/instrumentation , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Patient Transfer , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Med Syst ; 44(10): 177, 2020 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-739066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has become the most serious global health issue. Isolation policy in hospitals is one of the most crucial protocols to prevent nosocomial infection of COVID-19. It is important to monitor and assess the physical conditions of the patients in isolation. METHODS: Our institution has installed the novel non-contact wireless sensor for vital sign sensing and body movement monitoring for patients in COVID-19 isolation ward. RESULTS: We have collected and compared data between the radar record with the nurse's handover record of two patients, one recorded for 13 days and the other recorded for 5 days. The P value by Fisher's exact test were 0.139 (temperature, P > 0.05) and 0.292 (heart beat rate, P > 0.05) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report about the application experience of this equipment. Therefore we attempted to share the experience and try to apply this equipment in COVID-19 patients in future to offer the more reliable and safe policy.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Radar/instrumentation , Telemetry/instrumentation , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospital Administration , Humans , Movement , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Mov Disord ; 35(11): 1897-1902, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-737927

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the fragility of clinic-based care for Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. In response to the virus, many clinics across the world abruptly closed their doors to persons with Parkinson's disease. Fortunately, a niche care model, telemedicine-first described in this journal a generation ago-emerged as the dominant means of providing care. As we adjust to a new normal, we should focus future care not on clinics but on patients. Their needs, guided by clinicians, should determine how care is delivered, whether in the clinic, at home, remotely, or by some combination. Within this patient-centered approach, telemedicine is an attractive care option but not a complete replacement for in-person consultations, which are valuable for specific problems and for those who have access. Now that many clinicians and patients have gained exposure to telemedicine, we can better appreciate its advantages (eg, convenience) and disadvantages (eg, restricted examination). We can also create a new future that utilizes the Internet, video conferencing, smartphones, and sensors. This future will bring many clinicians to one patient, connect individual experts to countless patients, use widely available devices to facilitate diagnosis, and apply novel technologies to measure the disease in new ways. These approaches, which extend to education and research, enable a future where we can care for anyone anywhere and will help us stem the tide of Parkinson's disease. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/therapy , Patient-Centered Care , Telemedicine , COVID-19 , Continuity of Patient Care , Disease Management , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Pandemics , Patient-Centered Care/trends , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2 , Smartphone , Telemedicine/trends , Telemetry/instrumentation , Telemetry/trends , Videoconferencing , Wearable Electronic Devices
11.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(11): 2803-2811, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-732126

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a worldwide pandemic, and cardiovascular complications and arrhythmias in these patients are common. Cardiac monitoring is recommended for at risk patients; however, the availability of telemetry capable hospital beds is limited. We sought to evaluate a patch-based mobile telemetry system for inpatient cardiac monitoring during the pandemic. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed of inpatients hospitalized during the pandemic who had mobile telemetry devices placed; patients were studied up until the time of discharge or death. The primary outcome was a composite of management changes based on data obtained from the system and detection of new arrhythmias. Other clinical outcomes and performance characteristics of the mobile telemetry system were studied. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent mobile telemetry device placement, of which 31 (37.8%) met the primary outcome, which consisted of 24 (29.3%) with new arrhythmias detected and 18 (22.2%) with management changes. Twenty-one patients (25.6%) died during the study, but none from primary arrhythmias. In analyses, age and heart failure were associated with the primary outcome. Monitoring occurred for an average of 5.3 ± 3.4 days, with 432 total patient-days of monitoring performed; of these, QT-interval measurements were feasible in 400 (92.6%). CONCLUSION: A mobile telemetry system was successfully implemented for inpatient use during the COVID-19 pandemic and was shown to be useful to inform patient management, detect occult arrhythmias, and monitor the QT-interval. Patients with advanced age and structural heart disease may be more likely to benefit from this system.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , Electrocardiography/instrumentation , Heart Rate , Inpatients , Telemetry/instrumentation , Action Potentials , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL